🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers noted the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their models.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own private free version of the service”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.